Scott v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from Bosque. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice.
At a former day of this term, upon motion of the Attorney-General, this writ of error was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The cause was then removed by writ of error to the Supreme Court. In accordance with the opinion of that court rendered January 15, 1894 [86 Texas, 321], it has been returned to this court for decision on the merits. Before announcing that decision, we deem it proper to state our views upon the question of jurisdiction involved. It is perhaps to be regretted that this was not done -when the writ was dismissed, as the Supreme Court seems to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Knote v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Munson v. HallowellTexas Supreme Court · 1863
- In the Matter of ____, an AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Timmins v. Bonner & LongTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Brothers v. Mundell, Munzesheimer & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re AbramsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Nelson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Ex Parte CrislerMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Lotto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- In re SuttonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.