Legal Opinion

In re Sutton

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1914No. 3,502PublishedCited by 9 opinions

E. L.' Sutton, a member of tbe bar of Montana, was convicted of tbe crime of forgery, and ordered disbarred under tbe provisions of subdivision 1 of section 6393 and section 6410, Revised Codes.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantlt

On April 11, 1914, E. L. Sutton was tried in the district court of Chouteau county upon a charge of forgery, and by a verdict of the jury found guilty. He was thereafter by judgment of the court sentenced to a term of two years in the state prison. At the time the charge was preferred against him, and at the time of his conviction,' Mr. Sutton was an attorney and counselor at law and a member of the bar of Montana. Thereafter, on May 14, the clerk of the district court, under the command of the statute (Rev. Codes, sec. 6409), lodged with the clerk of this court a certified copy of the record…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. In Re RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re NeedhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. In Re CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Jamison v. FlannerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. In Re PetersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Anderson v. WirkmanMontana Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API