Legal Opinion

Jones v. Maple

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2000No. 16A01-0001-JV-35PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Chad Jones appeals the denial of his motion to set aside the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Jeffrey *283and Michelle Gauek, intervenors in Jones’ paternity action.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Whether the trial court erred in denying Jones’ motion.

FACTS

On July 20, 1998, Mary Jane Maple signed a “Consent of Biological Mother to Private Adoption,” (R. 91), wherein she averred that she was seven months pregnant and had determined that Jeffrey and Michelle Gauck were the proper persons to adopt her unborn child. Maple also averred that the identity of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Robert O. v. Russell K.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re the Termination of Parental Rights Over Boy K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re the Adoption of S.J.B.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Kaghann's Korner, Inc. v. Brown & Sons Fuel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Paternity of Baby DoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API