Jones v. Maple
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Chad Jones appeals the denial of his motion to set aside the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Jeffrey *283and Michelle Gauek, intervenors in Jones’ paternity action.
We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether the trial court erred in denying Jones’ motion.
FACTS
On July 20, 1998, Mary Jane Maple signed a “Consent of Biological Mother to Private Adoption,” (R. 91), wherein she averred that she was seven months pregnant and had determined that Jeffrey and Michelle Gauck were the proper persons to adopt her unborn child. Maple also averred that the identity of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robert O. v. Russell K.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re the Termination of Parental Rights Over Boy K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re the Adoption of S.J.B.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Kaghann's Korner, Inc. v. Brown & Sons Fuel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Paternity of Baby DoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000