Legal Opinion

In Re Paternity of Baby Doe

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2000No. 16A01-0001-JV-35PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

734 N.E.2d 281 (2000)

In re: The Matter of the PATERNITY OF BABY DOE,

Chad Michael Jones, Appellant,

v.

Mary Jane Maple, Appellee,

Jeffrey Gauck and Michelle Gauck, Intervening Appellees.

No. 16A01-0001-JV-35.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

August 30, 2000.

Merle B. Rose, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant.

Timothy D. Day, Comer Day & Ertel, Osgood, Indiana, Attorney for Appellee.

John Q. Herrin, Wood Tuohy Gleason Mercer & Herrin, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Intervening Appellees.

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Chad Jones appeals the denial of his motion to set aside the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Robert O. v. Russell K.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re the Termination of Parental Rights Over Boy K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re the Adoption of S.J.B.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Kaghann's Korner, Inc. v. Brown & Sons Fuel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Mary L. Anderson v. Wayne Post 64, American Legion Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. In re C.L.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. In Re Adoption of Infant Female FitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In Re Adoption of JDCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API