Legal Opinion

Robert O. v. Russell K.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1992PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Simons, J.

Petitioner, an unwed father, seeks to vacate a final order approving the adoption of his son. He contends that the mother or the State had a duty to ensure he knew of the birth and that their failure to do so denied him his constitutional rights. Inasmuch as petitioner failed to take any steps to discover the pregnancy or the birth of the child before first asserting his parental interest 10 months after the adoption became final, we conclude he was neither entitled to notice nor was his consent to the adoption required. We, therefore, affirm.

I

The courts below…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Heidbreder v. CartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API