Legal Opinion

American Appliance v. E.W. Real Estate Management, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 2001No. 47 M.D. Appeal Docket 2000PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This appeal raises issues involving the interpretation of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings Before District Justices, Pa.R.C.P.D.J. Specifically, we must determine whether Rules 1002 and 1004 are satisfied when a party appeals judgments on a complaint and cross-complaint by filing a single notice of appeal and attaching both judgments to the notice. 1 The Superior Court held that the rules require two separate notices of appeal. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand to the common pleas court for further proceedings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Lindstrom v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Burr v. CallwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Borough of Downingtown v. WagnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stilp v. COM., GENERAL ASSEMBLYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. American Financial Mortgage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Piehl v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Trowbridge v. McCaigueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Metcalf v. PesockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API