Legal Opinion

Hyundai Semiconductor America v. City of Eugene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2001No. OTC 4167; SC S46528Published

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

In this tax case, plaintiff challenges a condition imposed by defendants on applicants for a property tax exemption in an enterprise zone. On summary judgment motions, the Oregon Tax Court ruled that the condition violated ORS 285.577(4) (1995) (set out below). 1 Hyundai Semiconductor America v. City of Eugene, 14 OTR 557, 565 (1999). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that plaintiff failed to exhaust its administrative remedies. We therefore vacate the decision of the Tax Court and remand the case to that court with instructions to dismiss the complaint.

The following undisputed facts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Nutbrown v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API