Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Johnson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. S. P. McConnell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.

It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that any motion for a new trial was made in this case, or that any exception was taken to any action of the court in overruling such motion, if any was made.

A motion for a new trial is not a part of the record, nor are exceptions taken to the action of the court upon the same. Such motion and exceptions must be made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions or we can not take notice thereof.

The minute made by the clerk of the motion for a new trial and exception to the action of the court thereon are no part of the record. Obermark v. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. FoulkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. James v. DexterIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Graham v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Daniels v. ShieldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Gill v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ames & Frost Co. v. StachurskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  2. Dignan v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  3. McIntosh v. BarnesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  4. Baldwin v. McClellandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  5. Continental Investment & Loan Society v. SchubnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API