Legal Opinion

Graham v. People

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1886PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Writ of Error to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. Rollin S. Williamson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tunnicliff

The plaintiffs in error, Eobert Graham and Hugh McCue, were convicted, in the Criminal Court of Cook county, of the crime of robbing the prosecutor of his watch.

On the trial the following question was asked the prosecuting witness, viz: “Have you been approached by anybody in the interest of these defendants, and have you taken any money to settle this case?” to which he made the following answer: “Yes, sir; I took $25 from Mr. Hemingway, the uncle of Graham, in payment of my watch, as I supposed. The watch was not mine. It belongs to another man, who left it with me as security for a bill,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bulliner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Daniels v. ShieldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Gill v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HaselwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Call v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. The People v. YetterIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. WestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API