Legal Opinion

Ames & Frost Co. v. Stachurski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 28, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard W. Clifford, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

This is an action by the appellee to recover damages for personal injury sustained by him in the factory of the appellants, where he was employed.

The bill of exceptions recites that at the close of the evidence for the plaintiff, appellee, the counsel for the defendants, appellants, said : “I will enter a motion for the court

to instruct the -jury to find for the defendant.” And also that at the close of the testimony of the first witness for the appellants “ Counsel for defendant renewed his motion to exclude the evidence of the plaintiff and to instruct the jury to find a verdict for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coal Co. v. SchaeferIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Law v. FletcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Foreman v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  4. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute R. R. v. DorseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Consolidated Coal Co. v. SchaeferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hallberg v. BrosseauAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. Swift & Co. v. FueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  3. Provident Hospital v. BarbourAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  4. Rolfe v. RichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API