Legal Opinion

Day v. Cloke

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1923No. 2553PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Ducker, C. J.:

The respondent, who was plaintiff in the court below, brought this action to recover $10,000 damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while in the employ of appellant in his blacksmith shop in Tonopah, Nye County, Nevada. It is alleged in the complaint that on the 3d day of December, 1919, plaintiff was in the employ of said Jack Cloke as a blacksmith, and, while working on the repair of a wagon, and due to the negligence of said defendant, the said wagon slipped from its holdings; that plaintiff, while jumping to escape being crushed by the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Authors v. BryantNevada Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Williams v. ChadbourneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Crumley v. FabbiNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lockhart v. MackieNevada Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Richard Matthews, Jr., Inc. v. VaughnNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cahow v. MichelasNevada Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Moormeister v. Golding, Director of Registration Dept.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API