Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Mackie

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe District Court of tbe Eourtb Judicial District, Hon. R. S. Mesick presiding. Tbe facts are stated in tbe Opinion. cited tbe following authorities to show that a verdict will be set aside merely on tbe ground that it is against tbe weight of evidence: 7 Mass. 261; 18 Mass. 507; 20 Pick. 285-9; 15 Pick. 291; 1 Met. 221; 7 How.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of tbe District Court of tbe Eourtb Judicial District, Hon. R. S. Mesick presiding. Tbe facts are stated in tbe Opinion. cited tbe following authorities to show that a verdict will be set aside merely on tbe ground that it is against tbe weight of evidence: 7 Mass. 261; 18 Mass. 507; 20 Pick. 285-9; 15 Pick. 291; 1 Met. 221; 7 How. Prac. 64; 6 Hill,'438-444; 1 Caine, 25,162 ; 1 Marshall, 188-335 ; 4 Dana, 423 ; 1 Bibb, 129-570; 3 Bibb, 35,224; 4 Little, 259 ; 4 Monroe, 482 ; 7 Monroe, 223; 3 J. J. Marshall, 421; 2 Bibb, 33 ; 3 J, J. Marshall, 442. That it was the duty…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beatty, J., Lewis, C. J., concurring specially.

This was an action brought for an ox team, wagon, etc. The wagon and a part of the cattle belonged to one Stockham in the year 1864, and both parties found their claim to the property on title derived from Stockham. The plaintiff claiming that Stockham sold to J. S. Bostwick, and Bostwick to plaintiff. The defendant’s theory is that Stockham sold to Symington, and Symington to defendant.

The case was tried before the Judge without a jury, who found for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff makes but two points in this…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Day v. ClokeNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  2. McClain v. BeanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API