Legal Opinion

Schelling v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1926No. 2611PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The case at bar involves a protest filed by appellant with the collector at the port of New York, in and by which protest it is claimed certain lace curtains duly invoiced and entered, were short-shipped, and on account of which a refund of duty paid was requested. This protest was overruled by the collector, which ruling was duly sustained by the court below. Thereupon the importer appealed to this court.

The importer appears here without counsel and many of his pleadings are subject to technical objections. In view of the conditions existing, however, the court has carefully examined the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Spencer, Kellogg & Sons (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Kronfeld v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kreutz v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  2. Protest 114979-K of Pacific Customs Brokerage Co.United States Customs Court · 1947
  3. Protest 87697-K of Washington State Liquor Control BoardUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  4. Protest 97965-K of Italian Furniture Frames Corp.United States Customs Court · 1945
  5. United States v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API