Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kreutz v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 23, 1932No. 3492Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Gb,aham, Presiding Judge:

I am unable to agree with the opinion of the majority in this case. The question which arises here is one of very serious import to the customs service. As I view it, it is, in brief, whether the importer of impure or dangerous drugs or foods may evade the laws which have been provided for the protection of our people and may be permitted to substitute his own methods of attempted compliance therewith.

The appellant imported ergot, a well-known abortifacient drug. The collector estimated duties upon it from a sample taken at the wharf. The goods had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Gump Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API