Protest 97965-K of Italian Furniture Frames Corp.
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ekwall, J.
At the trial Government counsel, citing the case of Schelling v. United States (14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 159, T. D. 41691), claimed that the-importer’s claim should be disallowed due to noncompliance with the customs regulations. Since that decision it has been held that in shortage cases the issue before the court is whether or, not there is in fact a nonimportation and compliance-with the regulations is not a condition precedent to recovery. Under the rulings laid'down in Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. v. United States (14 Cust. Ct. 71, C. D. 914), and Abstract 50268, and in view…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
- Schelling v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926