Legal Opinion

Estate of Richardson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1946No. Civ. 15147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From an order of the probate court revoking letters testamentary issued to Charles S. Darden, he appeals.

Three questions are presented for our determination which will be stated and answered hereunder seriatim:

First: Did the probate court have the right to revoke the letters testamentary without a hearing on the merits of appellant’s current account?

This question must be answered in the affirmative. Section 521 of the Probate Code provides in part as follows:

1 ‘ Suspension and Removal: Causes and procedure. Whenever a judge of the court has reason to believe from his own knowledge, or from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Estate of MintaberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Clymer v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API