Legal Opinion
Hamidian v. Occulto
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 10, 1994No. 93-0556PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
VANASKIE, District Judge.
On April 15, 1993, Plaintiff Antoinette M. Hamidian (“Hamidian”) commenced the above-captioned civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Frank Occulto (“Occulto”), former Chief of Police of the Dunmore Police Department, seeking damages for false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. (Dkt.Entry # 1, p. 2 and Dkt.Entry #37.) Occulto filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on February 7, 1994, (Dkt.Entry # 25), and the case was then reassigned to the undersigned on March 2,1994. (Dkt.Entry # 29.) A Pre-Trial conference was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Growth Horizons, Inc. v. Delaware County, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Kenneth S. Cameron v. Matthew Fogarty and John HalbigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Deary v. Three Un-Named Police OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cosmas v. Bloomingdales Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- McGriff v. VidovichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Basile v. Township of SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Torres v. McLaughlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Imbergamo v. CastaldiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.