Legal Opinion

Imbergamo v. Castaldi

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 2005No. Civil Action 3:04-0292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MANNION, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment on Count II of the plaintiffs amended complaint filed on behalf of defendants Castaldi, Hennigan, Mulvey, VanLuvender, and Varcoe, (collectively referred to as “State Police Defendants”), (Doc. No. 48). Based upon the court’s review of the record in this action, the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the State Police Defendants will be granted.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The plaintiff initiated the instant civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 9,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Orsatti v. New Jersey State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
  2. Basile v. Township of SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. PEREZ-CINTRON v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API