Legal Opinion
Dadbod Apparel LLC v. Hildawn Design LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 10, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00188Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DADBOD APPAREL LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00188-DJC-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HILDAWN DESIGN LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Dadbod Apparel LLC brings the present suit alleging that Defendants 18 Hildawn Design LLC and Hilary D. Wertin misused trademarks owned by Defendants 19 to interfere with Plaintiff’s sale of various goods on online platforms. Plaintiff alleges 20 that Defendants utilized their “GIRLDAD” trademark to initiate takedown actions 21 against several of Plaintiff’s products on…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.