In Re Villeneuve
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Defendant Ford Motor Co. appeals from a ruling of the Chittenden Superior Court which overturned a decision of the New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board because of the participation in it of board members who did not attend the evidentiary hearing. The arbitration board decision found that a Ford truck which plaintiff, David Villeneuve, purchased new from a local Ford dealer was not a “lemon” and plaintiff was not entitled to a refund. Defendant argues that the court decision was erroneous under the very narrow standard of review applicable to these proceedings. Plaintiff argues, by way of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Quechee Lakes Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Lewandoski v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMCSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Matzen Construction, Inc. v. Leander Anderson Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carr v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Reed v. GlynnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- In Re Appeal of ReynoldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In re LakatosSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Anthony Davey v. James BakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.