Legal Opinion

In Re Villeneuve

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 6, 1998No. 96-640PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Defendant Ford Motor Co. appeals from a ruling of the Chittenden Superior Court which overturned a decision of the New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board because of the participation in it of board members who did not attend the evidentiary hearing. The arbitration board decision found that a Ford truck which plaintiff, David Villeneuve, purchased new from a local Ford dealer was not a “lemon” and plaintiff was not entitled to a refund. Defendant argues that the court decision was erroneous under the very narrow standard of review applicable to these proceedings. Plaintiff argues, by way of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Quechee Lakes Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Lewandoski v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMCSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Matzen Construction, Inc. v. Leander Anderson Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carr v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Reed v. GlynnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. In Re Appeal of ReynoldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. In re LakatosSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Anthony Davey v. James BakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API