Legal Opinion
Carrick Realty Corp. v. Flores
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 26, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louise Gruner Gans, J.
An unrelated third party is not required to alter its computer system or to incur inordinate expense in order to comply with an information subpoena served by a judgment creditor pursuant to CPLR 5223 and 5224 (a) (3).
A judgment in favor of plaintiff/petitioner Garrick Realty for $1,738.60 was entered against defendant Flores on August 25, 1980. Respondent Paychex, Inc. (Paychex) and movant Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) are both national payroll processing companies. Neither of them was a party to the underlying action between Garrick Realty…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Guardian Loan Co. v. EarlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Digitrex, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Therm-X-Chemical & Oil Corp. v. ExtebankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Cook v. H. R. H. Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Gavilanes v. MatavosianCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fidelity Partners, Inc. v. Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee CorpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Tener v. CremerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Limonium Maritime, S.A. v. Mizushima Marinera, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- S & S Machinery Corp. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003