S & S Machinery Corp. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Williams, J.
The issue on this appeal is whether the defendant bank processed and responded to plaintiff judgment creditor’s restraining notice and information subpoena in a reasonable manner, as a matter of law.
This action is the result of plaintiff’s efforts to enforce a judgment obtained in July 1991 against Masinexportimport (Masin), a Romanian trading company, in the amount of $1,573,163.20 plus costs. In April 1992, plaintiff, unsuccessful in its collection efforts thus far, served restraining notices and information subpoenas on several New York banks which it had…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Argentina v. Otsego Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Digitrex, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Therm-X-Chemical & Oil Corp. v. ExtebankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Tillmon v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Greenbaum v. HandlesbankenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Limonium Maritime, S.A. v. Mizushima Marinera, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Hayes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Motorola Credit Corporation v. Standard Chartered BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Motorola Credit Corporation v. Standard Chartered BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.