Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Weast

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1951No. 5223PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Superior Court Judge.

Plaintiffs W. H. Weast and Gertrude F. Weast, husband and wife, filed an equitable action to quiet title to certain lands, hereinafter described, joining as defendants Roland Cummings and Marjorie Cummings, his wife. The husband defaulted but the wife appeared and answered. A trial to the court, sitting without a jury, resulted in a judgment for plaintiffs. After denial of her motion for a new trial, Marjorie Cummings alone has appealed. ' She will be hereafter, referred to as defendant and the appellees designated as plaintiffs.

To determine the legal questions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tourette v. TouretteArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Coe v. WinchesterArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Greer v. GoeslingArizona Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nationwide Resources Corp. v. MassabniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Chase Bank of Arizona v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. MacCollum v. PerkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Kennedy v. MorrowArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. A. L. Attaway, Annie Laurie Attaway, Hugh D. McCullough E. A. McCullough and Ruth McCullough v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API