Legal Opinion
Coe v. Winchester
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1934No. Civil No. 3359PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
Ranney Van Norman Winchester and Tasso Coe were partners in a merchandise brokerage business under the firm name of Winchester-Coe Company, in Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona, from July 1, 1924, until May 22, 1930. On this last date Winchester died. The widow, Myrtle Hayes Winchester, was appointed executrix of his estate. The survivor, Tasso Coe, refused to account to her for any portion of the partnership assets, whereupon she brought suit for an accounting in which suit she was sustained by the trial court. Coe has appealed.
Before stating the grounds of the appeal and the contentions of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tourette v. TouretteArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- McKinnon v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Murphy v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of BordenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
3Cited by26 opinions
- Estate of Harrison P. Shedd, Deceased First National Bank of Arizona, Phoenix v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Hatch v. HatchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Nationwide Resources Corp. v. MassabniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Chase Bank of Arizona v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.