Legal Opinion

Brinn v. Brinn

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 17, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

It is admitted that the following statement, taken from the petition for appeal, correctly sets forth the facts:

“By a decree entered on the 17th of March, 1923, by the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk, in the suit for divorce and alimony of Mary M. Brinn (the appellee here) against George C. Brinn (the appellant here), the said Mary M. Brinn was granted and awarded a divorce a vinculo matrimonii from the said George C. Brinn, and the latter was directed to pay her as alimony, which was decreed to be a-lien on his real estate, the sum of $1,500 per annum, in monthly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Emerson v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  2. Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Walker v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bacon v. BaconWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gloth v. GlothSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Eaton v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. Parra v. ParraCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
  4. McCotter v. CarleCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1927
  5. Capell v. CapellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API