Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1927No. 7 Div. 621PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

With respect to permanent alimony our statute declares:

“If the divorce is in favor of the wife for the misconduct of the husband, the allowance must be as liberal as the estate of the husband will permit, regard being had to the condition, of his family and to all the circumstances of the case.” Code 1923, § 7419; Code 1852, § 1972.

Under this statute as always construed, the allowance to the wife may be made in gross out of the husband’s estate, payable presently, or as directed; or it may be made, as for continuous maintenance, payable in monthly or other periodical installments, ■during the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Doe ex dem Duval's heirs v. McLoskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  2. Wilson v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Storey v. StoreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Jeter v. JeterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Hager v. HagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Epps v. EppsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Roubicek v. RoubicekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Walters v. WaltersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API