Legal Opinion

Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Ritter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1923No. 11227Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY, C.

We have carefully examined the record and briefs in this case; and while there are 500 pages of the record, counsel on both sides have relieved us of reading very much of the record, as both briefs are very full of the facts, both in the present ease and in the former case. We have also read the -opinion! of this court on the appeal of the replevin suit between the same parties; said opinion being found in 69 Okla. 95, 170 Pac. 482, and we think a great deal of the record in this case and the argument of counsel for plaintiffs in error is based too much on the record in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. RitterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Hardesty v. NaharkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Union Nat. Bank v. Lavacota Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API