Legal Opinion

Pelton v. Schmidt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Negligence case. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The plaintiff, a teamster, after having-delivered some merchandise at the back door of defendants’ store, started towards the desk near the middle of the room to get a receipt, and was injured by falling through a trapdoor into the cellar. The floor drawing on next page will explain the situation of the premises. . .

As appears from the drawing, the trap, when not in use, 'was covered by double doors, a hole being left to permit the doors to shut around the pulley rope which was suspended there. This pulley was used to raise and lower articles from and into the cellar below, and usually hung…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Redigan v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Engel v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bedell v. BerkeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Menteer v. Scalzo Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Pelton v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bennett v. ButterfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Flanagan v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Amerine v. PorteousMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API