Legal Opinion

State v. Slane

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1935No. 1871PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

The defendant in this case was convicted of having carnal knowledge of Dorothy Isaacson, a female under the age of 18 years and hereinafter called the prose-cutrix. From a judgment entered in accordance with the finding of the jury, the defendant appeals. A number of errors have been assigned,

1. The court instructed the jury that one of the material obligations, which was required to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, was that the defendant did on or about the 20th day of March, 1932, carnally know Dorothy Isaacson. The state, pursuant to an order of the court, elected to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bogk v. GassertSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. State v. TobinWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McMath v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Strand v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Story v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States v. Alfred Marion Spoonhunter, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Moulder v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API