Legal Opinion

California Orange Co. v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1920No. Civ. No. 3233PublishedCited by 30 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action at law to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff’s orange orchard, caused by the deposit on the trees of cement dust from defendant’s cement-mill. Plaintiff recovered judgment for a total of $6,300, of which $3,500 was for loss and injury to the crops for the years 1910, 1911, and 1912; $300 was for the increased labor and cost in the care of the trees, and the balance, $2,500, was for injury to the trees. From that judgment defendant appeals.

The orange orchard is located on a piece of high bench land situated on the northerly bank of the Santa Ana River, in Riverside…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Jenkins v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  5. Wm. Tackaberry Co. v. Sioux City Service Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hindman v. Texas Lime CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
  5. Stone v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API