Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1902PublishedCited by 19 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*332The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pitney, J.

This was an action of tort. The gist of the

plaintiffs declaration was that the defendant, in the operation of its railroad, negligently, unskillfully and unnecessarily caused dense smoke and noxious, penetrating and discoloring vapors and offensive odors, in greater quantities than were required for the legitimate and proper use and operation of the railroad, to arise and ascend near to, through and about the plaintiff’s dwelling-house, situate near the railroad, thereby rendering the house uncomfortable and unhealthy and unfit for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Priest v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. HoagIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Mark v. . Hudson River Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Ogden v. LucasIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Washburn v. GilmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. California Orange Co. v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Moran Towing Corporation v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. Campione v. SodenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API