Kellogg v. Northrup
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by Edward P. Kellogg against Beacb A. Northrup to recover the purchase price of real estate. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Declaration in assumpsit upon the common counts. Bill of particulars, balance due on sale of house and lot December 29, 1891. Plea, the general issue. The defense was that the deed was a mortgage. The court instructed the jury that the burden of proof was upon the plaintiff to establish the character of the deed. The learned circuit judge was in error. The onus probandi is upon him who asserts that a written instrument is not what it imports upon its face to be. A deed may be shown to be a mortgage. McMillan v. Bissell, 63 Mich. 66. While the court in that case were equally divided as to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McMillan v. BissellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Ferris v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Schmidt v. BarclayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Jones v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Robair v. DahlMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Holman v. Mason City Auto Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.