Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hampson v. Stanfield

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1940No. 34,810Published

1ConcurrenceAllen, J.

In the brief of appellee it is stated: “There are no intricate questions of law involved in the case and very few questions of fact.” The writer has found the question of law a perplexing one. Did the transferee, Stanfield, take the beneficial interest in the property subject to an equitable charge, or was a trust created?

More than a century ago Lord Eldon, in King v. Denison, 1 Ves. and B. 260, was troubled with the same question, and stated the distinction between a trust and an equitable charge:

“. . .. I will here point out the nicety of distinction, as it appears to me, upon which this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crowley v. NixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Downer v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Woodbury v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Morton v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API