Legal Opinion

Downer v. . Church

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1871PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from, an order of the Supreme Court, at General Term in the eighth district, affirming a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the report of a referee. The action was brought to compel the specific performance of a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant Loren Church. It appears, from the facts found by the referee, that Eoswell Downer died in January, 1857, leaving a widow, but no child.

Read the full summary

Appeal from, an order of the Supreme Court, at General Term in the eighth district, affirming a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the report of a referee. The action was brought to compel the specific performance of a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant Loren Church. It appears, from the facts found by the referee, that Eoswell Downer died in January, 1857, leaving a widow, but no child. He left certain real estate, consisting of a dwelling-house and about five acres of land, situate at Somerset, in Hi agar a county, of the value of about $1,000, and personal estate…

1Opinion of the Court

Leonard, C.

There can be no doubt of the validity of the agreement to compromise the hostile and conflicting claims of the plaintiff and defendant, as between themselves. The defendant Church argues that the property devised to him is charged with a trust for the maintenance of the widow of Boswell Downer, the deceased testator, and hence that he cannot legally convey it as he had agreed. The provision of the will, as stated in the case, is that the property is devised to Loren Church, subject to the support and maintenance of the widow. This language does not create a trust, it creates an…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kukatli v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bredesen v. NickolaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Gorman v. BrossardMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In re the Estate of EggswareNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Rld. v. StarkweatherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API