Legal Opinion

Morton v. Flanagan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1936No. 32,647PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This was an action to construe the will of Dora E. Clancy. Omitting the formal opening, the will reads:

“I want Mrs. Lillian Flanagan appointed executrix of this will.
“Now, when all just 'debts are paid and this estate is to be settled, I want all bonds to stand, as far as possible, as they are. There is one insurance policy in the Security Benefit Association and one in the Metropolitan Insurance Company. There is also money in the post office. Mrs. Lillian Flanagan is to have the distributing of this to be held as her own.
“$500 to M. F.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Halsey v. Convention of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the DioceseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  2. Holt v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Beakey v. KnutsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Gilman v. GilmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  5. Van Tassell v. Jefferson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of GerdesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Randall v. RandallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Sapp v. SappCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  4. Sapp v. SappCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  5. Hampson v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API