Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Brainard
California Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 13566PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered in favor of certain of the defendants after their general and special demurrers had been sustained without leave to amend.
As set forth in the complaint, it appears that the facts giving rise to this controversy are as follows:
On September 24, 1926, an involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against the Faget Engineering Company, a California corporation, engaged in business in San Francisco, and subsequently plaintiff herein was appointed trustee; that some time before the institution of the bankruptcy proceedings a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gass v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Rosenthal v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Guaranty Security Corp. v. OppenheimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- McCombs v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zimmermann v. Southern California Bank (In Re Hilde)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Travis v. Bixler Vapor Dry Cleaning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Servall Automobile Service, Inc. v. McDuffieArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Gonzales v. CadenaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010