Legal Opinion

Young v. Kinney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1909No. 15,767PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Kimball county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

This is an action in replevin involving the ownership and the right of possession of a horse valued in plaintiff’s affidavit at $45. The court costs now amount to about $600. Tliis is the second appeal of the case. The opinion on the first appeal is reported in 79 Neb. 421. In the first trial the plaintiff recovered verdict and judgment. On appeal the case was reversed on two grounds, one of them being that the plaintiff on cross-examination was asked if he had not testified at the trial in the county court that the first time he saw the animal in question to remember it was when it was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Young v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Fitch v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Madsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Peaks v. LordNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hampton v. StruveNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Edmonds v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Randall v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Abbott v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Barry v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API