Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1911No. 16,265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Custer county: Bbuno O. Hostetler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the loss of a barn and several outbuildings destroyed by fire, which the plaintiff alleges was negligently kindled by the defendant. The plaintiff prevailed, and the defendant appeals.

There was no error in permitting the plaintiff to prove that Sheridan coal burns slowly and retains fire longer than bituminous coal. The testimony is undisputed that Sheridan coal is a lignite, and is used by the defendant in its locomotives on the division of the railway which includes the station of Broken Bow, where the plaintiff’s property was located. These facts,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burlington & Missouri R. R. v. WestoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Fitch v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. KellerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Young v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Blomgren v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'DELL v. GoodsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bradley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. O'DELL v. GoodsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API