Legal Opinion
Webster v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 27, 1975PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Judge.
Plaintiff, Judith Webster, initiated this action to recover for so-called “no-fault insurance” benefits under the provisions of her contract of insurance with the defendant, State Farm Insurance Company. Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the basis that plaintiff has split her cause of action since she failed to join State Farm as a defendant in a separate tort action filed against the operator of the automobile whose alleged negligence caused the accident which gave rise to the claim for no-fault benefits.
The precipitating accident occurred on July 19, 1972, and during…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Epstein v. Chatham Park, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1959
- Christian v. Wilmington General Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
- DeVincentis v. Maryland Casualty CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1959
- White v. MetzerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gareeb v. WeinsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Moody v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Harper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Nationwide Ins. Co. v. RothermelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.