Legal Opinion
Harper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided November 26, 1997No. 5, 1997PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The plaintiff-appellant, Dolores Harper (“Harper”), filed a complaint on July 29,1996 in the Superior Court seeking personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits under her automobile insurance policy. That insurance coverage had been issued to her by the defendant-appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). The automobile accident that caused Harper’s injuries occurred on October 17, 1992.
The Superior Court granted State Farm’s motion to dismiss Harper’s complaint. The Superior Court held that Harper’s cause of action for PIP benefits was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of America, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1987
- Nationwide Ins. Co. v. RothermelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Webster v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aponte-Correa v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Syed v. Hercules Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Waters v. United StatesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DannSuperior Court of Delaware · 2002
- Johnson v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.