Lorah v. Luppold Roofing Co., Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
This appeal' is from an order granting the motion for summary judgment raised by appellee AT & T Technologies and appellee Western Electric Company, Inc.. On appeal, appellant Harold Lorah claims that the lower court erred in determining that as a matter of law the Peculiar Risk Doctrine, an exception to the general rule that an employer of an independent contractor is not liable for the physical harm due to the negligence of the contractor or his servants, is not applicable. He claims that our prior precedent militates that we impose vicarious liability on the appellees for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Mentzer v. OgnibeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Ortiz v. Ra-El Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Fleck v. ANG Coal Gasification Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Gaytan v. Wal-MartNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Ted Mark Monk v. Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority Quality Electric Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Steiner v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.