Legal Opinion · Dissent

Van Amerogen v. Donnini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1990Published

1Dissent

Levine, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. Rarely is the meaning of statutory language entirely free from doubt so as to obviate all resort to legislative history or rules of construction, and the exemption from Labor Law liability for "owners of one and two-family dwellings” is no exception. The Legislature failed to define what is meant in referring to one- or two-family dwellings. By prior case law, it has been construed by this court to be limited to structures used exclusively for residential purposes (Zahn v Pauker, 107 AD2d 118, 121). And, in the instant case, the language has,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Ferres v. City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Harmon v. SagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Zahn v. PaukerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Klein v. A.D. Development Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API