Legal Opinion

Zahn v. Pauker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kane, J.

In the spring of 1980, defendant and her husband, Dr. Sidney Pauker, hired a contractor, Max Miller, to perform certain painting work to the outside of their house located at 303 Clinton Avenue in the City of Kingston, Ulster County. Since 1976, defendant has been the sole owner of the premises located at 303 Clinton Avenue, which consists of the Paukers’ residence and, in the basement, an office suite consisting of five rooms used for her husband’s medical practice. The medical office has its own separate entrance. On November 7,1980, while working on the outside…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Long v. Forest-FehlhaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Smith v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Stewart v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Linney v. Consistory of Bellevue Reformed ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Zangiacomi v. SaundersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Van Alstine v. PadulaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Van Amerogen v. DonniniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Bartoo v. BuellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API