Legal Opinion
Klein v. A.D. Development Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John S. Lockman, J.
Motion by plaintiff for consolidation of action numbers 1 and 2 is granted without opposition. Cross motion for summary judgment in action number 2 is denied.
*416The pleadings in action number 2 are deemed to be the pleadings in action number 1. The caption of the consolidated action shall read:
Frank Klein, Plaintiff v A.D. Development Ltd. and Kala Zeveri, Defendant
A.D. Development Ltd., Third-Party Plaintiff v Landover Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant
Turning to the cross motion, defendant Kala Zaveri seeks summary judgment in the consolidated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gregory v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Sarnoff v. Charles Schad, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Zahn v. PaukerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Van Amerogen v. DonniniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Van Amerogen v. DonniniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990