Legal Opinion

UFITEC, S.A. v. Carter

California Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1977No. L.A. 30767PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Plaintiff UFITEC, S.A. (UFITEC), a Swiss banking corporation, appeals from judgment in favor of defendant William H. Carter in an action to recover under Carter’s agreement to absorb losses incurred in a security trading venture. We affirm the judgment.

Carter, a Los Angeles resident, was president of Kleiner Bell Realty Company, subsidiary of Kleiner Bell Company, Inc., a security brokerage firm, which as part of its business underwrote speculative new issues.

In Los Angeles 1968, UFITEC and Carter negotiated an oral agreement providing as the trial court found: “(a) UFITEC…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,710 Stanley S. Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,747 Securities and Exchange Commission v. United Financial Group, Inc., Formerly Known as Usi Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kenton Capital, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  4. State v. PazIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API