Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Wint, United States of America v. Charlie Murdock, United States of America v. Stanley Arthur Bryan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1992No. 91-3831, 91-3832 and 91-3855PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Charlie Murdock and Michael Wint appeal from their convictions and sentences1 for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2, and threatening a witness with the intent to influence his testimony, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2,1512(b)(1). Stanley Bryan appeals from his convictions for conspiracy and aiding and abetting. We affirm.
I
The convictions of Murdock, Wint and Bryan centered around a drug transaction that occurred at a Minneapolis-St. Paul area hotel. Bryan, testifying for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Won Tae KimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. William Ivey, United States of America v. Mary Johnson, United States of America v. James NanceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. James P. ShoffnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Barela Cruz, United States of America v. Rufino GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Alex Derwin Horne, United States of America v. Joseph Jon FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Robert HarperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.