Legal Opinion
United States v. Alex Derwin Horne, United States of America v. Joseph Jon Franklin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1993No. 93-1130, 93-1131PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Alex Derwin Horne and Joseph Jon Franklin appeal their convictions on federal drug and firearm charges. They challenge the constitutionality of various searches and seizures of evidence, and contend that their conviction by an all-white jury was constitutionally infirm. Both appellants also argue that their convictions on certain counts were not supported by sufficient evidence. In addition, Franklin maintains that his trial should have been severed from Horne’s and that his sentence should not have been enhanced for his role in the conspiracy.
On June 4,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- United States v. Willie BoydCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John Monroe Kime, Also Known as Jack Kime, United States of America v. Randall Kirk BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Damien WellsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Alfred Leotis Rodgers, United States of America v. Michael Reed RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.