Legal Opinion
B-S Steel of Kansas, Inc. v. Texas Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 29, 2004No. 01-2410-JAR, 03-2664-JARPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
ROBINSON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs claims (Docs. 229 and 237). Defendants Texas Industries, Inc., Chaparral Steel Texas, Inc., and Chaparral Steel Company (hereinafter defendants) urge that Plaintiff B-S Steel of Kansas, Ine.’s (B-S Steel) claims are barred by the doctrines of res judicata (claim preclusion) and collateral estoppel (issue preclusion). Additionally, defendants…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- B-S Steel of Kansas, Inc. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Spiess v. MeyersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Foxfield Villa Associates, LLC v. RegnierDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. v. Torchmark Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Carrillo v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016