Legal Opinion
Spiess v. Meyers
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 10, 2007No. Civil Action 06-2175-KHVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Dale E. Spiess brings suit against Keith Meyers and Carol Foreman under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that defendants retaliated against him by declining to hire him because he exercised his right to free speech under the First Amendment. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 18) filed December 7, 2006 and Plaintiffs Motion For Leave To File A Surreply Memorandum In Opposition To Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 36) filed March 19, 2007. For reasons stated below, the Court overrules…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Herrera v. City of EspanolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Fisher v. DeCarvalhoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Klaassen v. AtkinsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- McClellan v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Bruce v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.