Legal Opinion
De Rose v. Byrne
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 3, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
139 N.J. Super. 132 (1976)
353 A.2d 100
RALPH C. DE ROSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COMMISSIONER OF THE WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BRENDAN T. BYRNE, GOVERNOR, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted January 21, 1976.
Decided February 3, 1976.
Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.
Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for appellant (Messrs. Robert J. Del Tufo, First Assistant Attorney General; David S. Baime, Chief, Appellate Section; John DeCicco, First Assistant, Appellate…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Oxfeld v. New Jersey State Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Sente v. Mayor and Mun. Coun. CliftonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- De Rose v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
3Cited by11 opinions
- Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Rybeck v. RybeckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Woodsum v. Pemberton Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- ATL. HIGHLANDS v. Atl. Highlands PBA Local 242New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.